Nevertheless, there were people who believed the end of the Mayan calendar foreboded the annihilation of the earth. The belief in the End of the World was reinforced by an increase in geological disasters such as the earthquake and tsunami that struck Asia on December 26, 2004, hurricane Katrina that flooded 80% of New Orleans on August 28 2005; and the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami of March 11, 2011, that triggered the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster.
There is a tangible atmosphere of relief now that we have passed the 21st December 2012 and the deadline for what many people thought would be the annihilation of the world according to the Mayan calendar, is behind us.
Yes, there has been an increase in the frequency of natural disasters. And yes, an Event of enormous proportions is approaching, one that will monopolize the attention of the whole world. Something new, on a planetary scale, is unfolding in nature, but there is nothing to fear, on the contrary, it is an occasion for celebration.
What the caterpillar calls the end of the world, the master calls a butterfly. Richard Bach
The world’s most powerful telescope, called the Square Kilometre Array (SKA), is scheduled to be built in 2016.
“It will have a deep impact on the way we perceive our place in the universe and how we understand its history and its future,” says Michiel van Haarlem, interim director general of the SKA project.”‘We know we are going to discover things.”
I know what the scientists will observe with the aid of SKA, and I hope by then they will have improved information that will enable them to correctly interpret the data. But I need to talk to you about misinterpreted science observations that are adding to the feelings of impending disaster.
Many years ago I found it difficult to talk openly about ‘planet migration’. But planet migration has at last been observed and it’s an acceptable topic. I would have taught a lot more people than I did, if I hadn’t been concerned about losing my credibility and their attention. So I told very few people that all planets migrate ever closer to the Sun and are eventually absorbed into the Sun. At that point in my life, I was the only voice making these comments, and because I was concerned about my credibility, I would very often leave someone with a diminished version of the Truth.
These days I can explain why planets migrate towards the Sun, but I still have some credibility concerns about explaining how they do so.
What I want to do, is to explain to you that the current theories about how planets migrate are wrong. You might think that I should just dive right in and tell you, but the truth about why and how planets journey closer to the Sun may be difficult for you to accept, and I don’t want you to lose the opportunity to understand as much as you can of the Truth of the glorious planetary system that is your home. So I am going to cautiously approach the areas that you may have difficulty accepting. But I will get there because I am elderly and I must do this while I am yet able.
It should comfort you to know that the scary theories that are currently gaining recognition about planetary migration are very wrong. Current theories of why planets move inwards towards the Sun are held up by math that has been worked to fit mistaken theories. When math has to be worked and worked until it fits a theory, both the theory and the math are wrong.
An article appeared in the Associated Press on August 26, 2009, with this dramatic title: ‘Suicidal’ Planet to be Swallowed by its Sun’. The theory that produced that headline proposes a catastrophe far, far greater than the very worst tsunami imaginable. And it fuels the concerns of the people who believe in the imminent annihilation of the earth. This is an excerpt from the article:
Astronomers have found what appears to be a gigantic suicidal planet. The odd, fiery planet is so close to its star and so large that it is triggering tremendous plasma tides on the star. Those powerful tides are in turn warping the planet’s zippy less-than-a-day orbit around its star. The result: an ever-closer tango of death, with the planet eventually spiralling into the star.
Planets do not commit suicide! All solar systems follow very precise Natural Laws. Whatever Laws apply in a solar system in outer space apply here in our solar system. Our earth is bracing to move closer to the Sun, and if you’re reading this, when the day of her Shift is imminent you will be informed, observant, and celebrating.
A separate news article had this to say about the same planet:
The star is called WASP-18 and the planet is WASP-18b after the “Wide Angle Search for Planets” (WASP) team that found them.
The planet circles a star that’s in the constellation Phoenix and is about 325 light-years away from Earth, which means it is in our galactic neighborhood. A light-year is about 5.8 trillion miles.
The planet is 1.9 million miles from its star, 1/50th of the distance between Earth and the sun, our star. And because of that the temperature is about 3,800 degrees.
Its size — 10 times bigger than Jupiter — and its proximity to its star means its likely to die.
When a planet is about to enter a sun, it is uninhabited. There are no life-forms on Wasp 18b. But there certainly were life-forms on Wasp18b before it reached this stage in its cycle. The life-forms that once inhabited Wasp 18b have completed their evolution and attained the highest biological form Wasp18b could produce. And now, as our scientists observe the former inhabitants of Wasp18b through telescopes, those entities are almost certainly watching their former planet too, from a safe distance. But what our scientists call the destruction of a planet, THEY CALL THE BIRTH OF A SUN!
“What the caterpillar calls the end of the world, the master calls a butterfly.” Richard Bach
What is to some ‘the end of the world’ is to others ‘rebirth.’
When the data from the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope come in it will reveal many more planets entering their suns and hopefully our scientists will understand that it is a common occurrence in the universe, and that a planet on the point of entering its sun is not, “committing suicide” it’s going to be converted into energy to sustain the life of the sun. Planets are born of suns, and it is their destiny to return to their suns. When a planet is converted into energy by its sun, the planet is transformed into a sun. It’s a wonderous Event for a planet when its time has come to be transformed into a sun.
There is a lot of other bad science circulating about planets ‘colliding’, ‘nudging’ and in other calamitous ways interacting with one another. If you click on the link below, you will find an article entitled ‘The Harsh Destiny of a Planet’, where you will read that a star called HD 82943 has ‘swallowed’ one of its planets. The article states
Did the star HD 82943 swallow one of its planets? What may at a first glance look like the recipe for a dramatic science-fiction story is in fact the well-considered conclusion of a serious scientific study, to be published by a group of astronomers in Switzerland and Spain in tomorrow’s issue of the international research journal “Nature”. http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso0118/
When scientists observe something new, something that they don’t understand, they hunt for a theory that will describe what they saw. Once they have a theory in hand, the next step is to create an elegant formula that supports the theory. Since a theory remains a hypothesis until is has been supported by experiments, and mathematics is a quick method of experimentation, scientists often create mathematics to fit their observations.
As the data from the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope will show, when a planet enters a sun it restores the sun’s internal energy.
Planetary migration is not a theory, it is a Natural Law. However, the explanations scientists are putting forward to explain planetary migration are only theories. And the math which they use to support their theories is wrong. I am telling you this because some of the theories for what goes on in a solar system sound scary, but they’re wrong. Look at this incredible headline, “New solar system formation models indicate that Jupiter’s foray robbed Mars of mass.” The article explains The Grand Tack Scenario, a theory that proposes that Jupiter stripped Mars of formation material:
Planetary scientists have long wondered why Mars is only about half the size and one-tenth the mass of Earth. As next-door neighbors in the inner solar system, probably formed about the same time, why isn’t Mars more like Earth and Venus in size and mass? A paper published in the journal Nature this week provides the first cohesive explanation and, by doing so, reveals an unexpected twist in the early lives of Jupiter and Saturn as well….
The “Grand Tack Scenario” demonstrates that the gas giant Jupiter may have briefly migrated into the inner solar system and influenced the formation of Mars (right), stripping away materials that resulted in its relatively small size in comparison to Venus and the Earth….
Dr. Kevin Walsh, a research scientist at Southwest Research Institute, led an international team performing simulations of the early solar system, demonstrating how an infant Jupiter may have migrated to within 1.5 astronomical units (AU, the distance from the Sun to the Earth) of the Sun, stripping a lot of material from the region and essentially starving Mars of formation materials.
Over the years many mathematicians have themselves expressed a lack of confidence in the ability of their field to actually prove the correctness of a theory.
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality. Albert Einstein
Another famous physicist said,
The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve. We should be grateful for it and hope that it will remain valid in future research and that it will extend, for better or for worse, to our pleasure, even though perhaps also to our bafflement, to wide branches of learning. Eugene Wigner
He proposed that there were arguments that could,
put a heavy strain on our faith in our theories and on our belief in the reality of the concepts which we form. It would give us a deep sense of frustration in our search for what I call ‘the ultimate truth’. The reason that such a situation is conceivable is that, fundamentally, we do not know why our theories work so well. Hence, their accuracy may not prove their truth and consistency.
Mathematics is not holy writ!
And then there is Occam’s Razor, the law of parsimony, which states,
When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better. William of Ockham
Nature always tends to act in the simplest way. Daniel Bernoulli
The current explanations and math put forward to support planetary migration are far from simple, rather, they are convoluted to the point of science fiction.
When astronomers use the word ‘star’ they are talking about a sun. I prefer to use the familiar term ‘sun’ because the term ‘star’ is also used for bright planets such as Venus, ‘the Morning Star.’
So, did HD 82943 swallow one of its planets? Suns certainly do absorb stars, but it absolutely is not cannibalism as this article suggests, “The VLT Uncovers Traces of Stellar Cannibalism” (May 9, 2001). Nor is it suicide as this article suggests, “‘Suicidal’ Planet to be Swallowed by its Sun” (August 26, 2009). For the evolution of the solar system and the continuation of all the life-forms within the solar system it is a Natural Law that a sun absorbs its planets.
This surprising discovery represents important observational evidence that planets may fall into their host stars.
Planets don’t ‘fall into their host stars’ in some random, accidental way. Planets are produced by their sun and they migrate back to their sun to be converted into energy. A solar system is the ultimate recycling living organism.
The parts of a solar system function as a unit. Every planet responds to the needs of the sun in which birthed it. Planet migration is the natural mechanism by which the individual parts of the solar system naturally respond to the needs of the whole. Planet absorption is the natural mechanism by which a sun is refueled. Nothing chaotic takes place in a solar system. Read this next absurd article:
But how do you nudge Earth into a new zip code? The most plausible model, out of several other unlikely mechanisms that were present in the very young solar system, is a gravitational billiard ball game called planet-planet scattering….. The unlucky “odd planet out” would have wound up falling into the sun, being ejected from the solar system, or crashing into another terrestrial planet.
Does that sound remotely like Occam’s Razor? Does it sound like a feasible explanation for the conduct of a vast, living organism? Solar systems do not play ball games. Planets do not collide, crash, fall or scatter. And there are no ‘unlucky odd planets out’.
God does not play dice with the Universe. Albert Einstein
When scientists – who should know better – promulgate theories of planet ‘scattering’, ‘nudging’, ‘falling’ and ‘crashing’; and when they blame humanity for global warming, it’s hardly surprising that so many good people are afraid. Bad science, global warming, the Mayan calendar, and misinterpreted Bible prophecies have all contributed to the popular belief that the earth is on the brink of destruction.
[I am now skipping over a large section of the original post. The section I’m missing refers to the importance of remaining in nature’s calendar Time and quotes verses from Daniel in the Old Testament. Our faithful adherence to the Earth’s forward-moving Time is a vital aspect of Earth Mother Our Womb of Life and I will soon devote at least one post to discussing it, but for now I want to take one final extract from the original post that discusses the science. I do however recommend you read the original post in its entirety.]
Yalak qets nuwach `amad gowral qets yowm Dan 12:13
Rest in your lot until the end of days (and you will inherit Heaven) Daniel Chapter 12 Verse 13
Scientists do not yet know that the earth and the core rotate in opposite directions, therefore they are intrigued by what they consider to be strange, inexplicable anomalies that occur inside the earth. And since it is the purpose of science to comprehend the inexplicable, scientists come up with theories about processes in the earth’s interior, some of which are close to the truth, some of which are not. Unfortunately it is often the case that once scientists have latched on to a theory they do their utmost to make the facts fit the theory. You can find one strange theory here: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080208091314.htm
I felt discouraged from taking the time to read the article thoroughly because the computer generated image on the website is completely unnatural, however, a skim-read provided the following information:
It has long been known that the inner core of the earth, a sphere consisting of a solid mass with a radius of about 1,200 km, is mainly made up of iron. However, seismic observations have shown that elastic waves pass more rapidly through the core in directions that are parallel to the earth’s axis of rotation than in directions parallel to the equator - a phenomenon that has not been previously explained. At the high temperatures that prevail in the core of the earth, these waves should pass at the same speed regardless of their direction….. In (a) new study the researchers present (computer) simulations of how seismic waves are reproduced in iron under the conditions that prevail in the core of the earth, showing a difference of about 12 percent depending on their direction-which suffices as an explanation for the puzzling observations.
At the following website you will learn that scientists are puzzling over “the mysterious layer where the mantle meets the core.” http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101027133152.htm
Andy Nowacki, at the School of Earth Sciences at Bristol University, said:
When a large earthquake occurs and waves travel through the Earth, they are affected in different ways, and we can examine their properties to work out what is happening thousands of miles beneath our feet, a region where we can never go. This study focusses on a mysterious layer where the mantle meets the core, a sphere of iron at the centre of the Earth 7,000 km (4400 miles) across. This part just above the core has curious properties which we can measure using seismic waves that pass through it.”
Professor Mike Kendall added:
This part of the Earth is incredibly important. The lowermost mantle is where two colossal, churning engines — the mantle and the core — meet and interact. The core is moving very quickly and creates our magnetic field which protects us from the Sun’s rays. The mantle above is sluggish, but drives the motion of the plates on the Earth’s surface, which build mountains, feed volcanoes and cause earthquakes. Measuring the flow in the lowermost mantle is vital to understanding the long term evolution of the Earth.
And, since all life on earth, including human life, is intimately linked to the earth, understanding the long term evolution of the earth is vital to understanding the long term evolution of mankind.
The life of every organism on earth evolves in association with the earth; indeed the evolution of all life-forms on earth is inseparable from the evolution of the earth. Therefore, obviously, a better understanding of the evolution of the earth will give mankind a better understanding of the evolution of humans.
As I have said, the opposing direction of rotation of the earth and the core is natural and has been going on since the earth’s earliest beginning, nevertheless, when this fact becomes public knowledge (and I suspect that day is not far off), it could be used to frighten you into evacuating real-time.
Years ago, when I was little more than a child, I found it very difficult to explain the details of the earth’s evolution. I cautiously explained that the planets had formed in a nebula and had then migrated inward, closer to the sun, to their current orbital positions. I drew pictures of planets migrating closer to a central sun and I called the migration ‘planetary shift’. A handful of people believed me, perhaps because it made sense to them, perhaps because they intuitively knew who I was, but most people thought I was a bit mad. I am pleased to say that these days the term ‘planetary migration’ is even found in Wikipedia. Click on the link below.
The positions of the planets often shifted, and planets have switched places. This planetary migration now is thought to have been responsible for much of the Solar System’s early evolution.
The generally accepted theory of planet formation from a protoplanetary disk predicts such planets cannot form so close to their stars
While I no longer feel uncomfortable talking about planets moving between orbits, there is still a great deal wrong with current theories of planetary migration. Scientists are right about planets forming via the core accretion mechanism, on the other hand they are wrong about the method of planetary migration. They propose that the planets underwent a lot of ‘nudging;, ‘bombardment’ and ‘collisions’ before settling into their current orbits. One theory proposes that Jupiter and Saturn “nudged Uranus and Neptune just right to cause them to migrate outward from the sun.” I do not understand how this idea gained acceptance. Planets cannot ‘nudge’ one another ‘just right’; if one planet ‘nudged’ another the results would be catastrophic! How the scientific community could consider the concept of planets nudging’one another ‘just right’ is bewildering.
A new model of our solar system is generating some excitement. It is called the Nice model, after the city of Nice, France, where the scientists met to develop the theory in 2004. It addresses how the orbits of the outer planets in our solar system could have changed over millions of years to become as we measure them today. Though the four giant planets have nearly circular orbits, their inclinations and eccentricities have been a difficulty for the Nebula Hypothesis. The Nice model proposes that Uranus and Neptune originally formed much closer to our sun than where they currently reside. Also, at one time Jupiter and Saturn supposedly had different orbits that nudged Uranus and Neptune just right to cause them to migrate outward from the sun. The model also proposes that matter left over after planet formation would cause the newly formed planets’ orbits to change. The enthusiasm for the Nice model is because it purports to explain not only why the planets are in their present orbits, but also some of the small objects in the solar system and why there would have been an intense bombardment of impacts after the planets formed. If the large gas planets in our solar system were migrating outward, this would cause collisions and drastically affect the asteroids as well as objects in the Kuiper region, beyond Neptune’s orbit. The Nice model does seem to give some very results very close to the observed characteristics of the orbits of the four giant planets. http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j21_3/j21_3_12-14.pdf
These days it is easier for me to talk about planets migrating from one orbit to another because it is ‘a widely accepted theory.’
The discovery of the ‘hot Jupiters’ led to the realization of the importance of orbital migration. This comes about because of the perceived difficulties in accumulating a core directly at small radii interior to the so called ‘snow line’. Instead, it is possible that the protoplanet formed at larger radii and migrated inwards. http://www.as.utexas.edu/astronomy/education/spring07/scalo/secure/PapaloizouTerquem06PlanForm.pdf
The earth has evolved considerably since its formation in a nebula. And each step in the earth’s evolution is catalyzed by two natural occurrences
- The ejection of a core
- Migration, closer to the sun
The great and powerful force of nature, deep inside the earth, is responsible for planetary migration. Human life is intimately linked to the earth and the core, and human development is utterly dependent upon planetary migration.
You will be told that the core will be ejected and life on earth will end. As I have said, that much is true, but a new life, will begin. As I have been explaining since I was a child, ‘Far away, in the furthermost reaches of the solar system, packed between layers of ice, is the story of our origin. And there, where Venus shines more brightly than any other star in the sky, there is our destiny.’